Fast‑track projects often compress design and construction into overlapping phases, which seems efficient but carries risks. I’m curious how others balance the speed benefits with the chance of rework or design clashes. Do you apply constructability assessments even under these conditions?
top of page
To see this working, head to your live site.
Comments (1)
bottom of page
On an airport expansion we worked on, running a Constructability Review during accelerated design stages uncovered conflicts in steel sequencing and service routing. Despite the compressed timeline, those adjustments prevented major clashes onsite that would have been far more costly. Even under schedule pressure, pausing briefly for review avoided cascading delays. It reinforced the principle that buildability analysis pays off even when time is tight.