I’ve been experimenting with different dialing modes recently and I keep running into the same dilemma. On one side, predictive dialing looks great because it keeps agents busy and the numbers fly up. But on the other hand, I’ve noticed customers sometimes feel rushed or even annoyed when they pick up and there’s a tiny delay before a voice comes through. With power dialing it’s slower, but at least the conversations seem more natural. Has anyone else struggled with this balance between call-throughput and keeping the customer experience decent?
top of page
To see this working, head to your live site.
The role of AI in call coaching and quality assurance: benefits and limitations
The role of AI in call coaching and quality assurance: benefits and limitations
2 comments
Comments (2)
Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
bottom of page
Yeah, that’s exactly the tricky part. I used predictive dialers for a sales team I managed last year, and while the call volume was amazing, we got hit with higher drop rates and some agents complained about awkward silences when the system tried to match calls to people. Customers could definitely sense something was “off.” Switching to power dialing slowed us down, but conversations flowed much better. I think the real key is knowing your audience. For cold outbound, predictive might make sense if you need sheer volume, but for high-value leads or B2B, power dialers usually win out. I read a breakdown here that explains the differences in detail and even compares use cases: https://autodialersoftware.io/. One thing I’d suggest from experience: test both modes with small groups and actually measure not just dials per hour but conversion rates, customer feedback, and agent satisfaction. Numbers alone can be misleading, and if your reps are frustrated or the client feels like just another data point, it cancels out the gains.